capitalism has the ability to subsume unto itself

“The British Rule in India by Karl Marx”. Marcon, Federico (2014): “Satō Nobuhiro and the Political Economy of Natural History in Nineteenth-Century Japan”. Luxemburg, Rosa (2003): The Accumulation of Capital. Luxemburg, Rosa (1972): Einführung in die Nationalökonomie. The Journal of Peasant Studies 24.4: 269–295. (1997): “Class Relations and Capitalist Development: Subsumption in the Colombian Coffee Industry, 1928–92”. Linhart, Sepp (2001): “Review of History’s Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life Overcome by Modernity: History, Culture, and Community in Interwar Japan, by Harry Harootunian”.

Lapavitsas, Costas (2013): Profiting without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All. Kuklick, Bruce (2006): “Review of Harootunian, The Empire’s New Clothes: Paradigm Lost and Regained”.

Harvey, David (1975): “The Geography of Capitalist Accumulation: A Reconstruction of the Marxian Theory”. (2004): The Empire’s New Clothes: Paradigm Lost, and Regained. New York, N.Y: Columbia University Press. (2000b): History’s Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. (2000a): Overcome by Modernity: History, Culture, and Community in Interwar Japan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (1988): Things Seen and Unseen: Discourse and Ideology in Tokugawa Nativism. Search in Google Scholarįrancks, Penelope (2005): “Multiple Choices: Rural Household Diversification and Japan’s Path to Industrialization”. Search in Google ScholarĮndnotes (2010): “The History of Subsumption by Endnotes”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1006/exeh.1993.1011 Search in Google ScholarĬhakrabarty, Dipesh (2000): Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Explorations in Economic History 30.3: 259–293. 10.1016/S0161-7230(04)21011-2 Search in Google Scholarīrandt, Loren (1993): “Interwar Japanese Agriculture: Revisionist Views on the Impact of the Colonial Rice Policy and the Labor-Surplus Hypothesis”. Edited by Paul Zarembka and Susanne Soederberg. In: Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg’s Legacy. 10.1177/0170840607096386 Search in Google Scholarīellofiore, Riccardo (2004): “‘Like a Candle Burning at Both Ends’: Rosa Luxemburg and the Critique of Political Economy”. Search in Google Scholarīanerjee, Subhabrata Bobby (2008): “Necrocapitalism”. Beiträge zur Marx-Engels-Forschung NF 1999: 5–11. (2000): “Marx, Orthodoxy, Labour, Value”. “The purpose of the book was to show that when Marx assigned to the working class the role of history’s agent, he also implied that since the worker, as one of the personifications of capitalism (but not quite like the capitalist, actually the personification of labor in the capital-labor dyad, according to Marx), belonged to a class situated within bourgeois social relationships.” (227) ReferencesĪrthur, Christopher J.

“The changeover to rotation conformed to procedures belonging to industrial capitalism that was completed with the reorganization inserting the wretched cottage system into the production process.” (181) “Lenin … acknowledged that an ‘infinitely diverse combinations of elements of this or that type of capitalist evolution are possible.’” (84) “This is in part the ‘secret of the commodity form itself,’ and the reason that ‘work assumed the form of value of a commodity’ is thus committed to ‘affirm its social character only in the commodity form of its product’” (58). “in the capitalist mode of mode of production itself” (40) “it is formerly speaking voluntary” (56) “Be that has it may” (74) “With Chakrabarty, as shall see,” (229) “In Asia, only Japan managed to successfully to escape the direct consequences of imperial colonization …” (153).

Capitalism has the ability to subsume unto itself